Minor Hockey Talks - Hockey Forum

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:41 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:07 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 1:13 pm Interesting when comparing the provincial rank of teams this year vs last year. What's everyone thoughts on whether is coaching or players which caused the the better/worse?

Improved Teams:

Beast - ranked 8 vs 74 last year
Jets - ranked 37 vs 53 last year
Terriers - ranked 24 vs 30 last year
Sharks - ranked 70 vs 75 last year
Eagles - ranked 3 vs 6 last year
West Mall - ranked 76 vs 79 last year

No change:

Rangers - ranked 1 vs 1 last year
Wolverines - ranked 57 vs 57 last year
Rattlers - ranked 18 vs 17 last year

Train wrecks:

Streetsville - ranked 87 vs 78 last year
Northstars - ranked 26 vs 15 last year
Caps - ranked 59 vs 40 last year
Toros - ranked 63 vs 35 last year
Panthers - ranked 91 vs 21 last year

Maybe view at years end to get a better idea after the full body of work is over. Even today the rankings have changed quite a bit over last week.


NS are hardly worth train wreck status. They lost some strong players and they have done well with what they have.

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Then MNS should be fine. But if he's coached a few seasons and never made a playoff or better yet was in the bottom 5, then player turnover will be huge and expect to be the next Panthers next season

Might want to do a little research.

Off topic here ...

Can anyone recommend a good body checking clinic or trainer? My son needs to improve (both receiving and delivering).

[quote=Guest post_id=184945 time=1738180186]
[quote=Guest post_id=184938 time=1738179661]
[quote=Guest post_id=184929 time=1738178462]
[quote=Guest post_id=184925 time=1738177991]
[quote=Guest post_id=184903 time=1738174029]
[quote=Guest post_id=184502 time=1738087995]
Interesting when comparing the provincial rank of teams this year vs last year. What's everyone thoughts on whether is coaching or players which caused the the better/worse?

Improved Teams:

Beast - ranked 8 vs 74 last year
Jets - ranked 37 vs 53 last year
Terriers - ranked 24 vs 30 last year
Sharks - ranked 70 vs 75 last year
Eagles - ranked 3 vs 6 last year
West Mall - ranked 76 vs 79 last year

No change:

Rangers - ranked 1 vs 1 last year
Wolverines - ranked 57 vs 57 last year
Rattlers - ranked 18 vs 17 last year

Train wrecks:

Streetsville - ranked 87 vs 78 last year
Northstars - ranked 26 vs 15 last year
Caps - ranked 59 vs 40 last year
Toros - ranked 63 vs 35 last year
Panthers - ranked 91 vs 21 last year
[/quote]

Maybe view at years end to get a better idea after the full body of work is over. Even today the rankings have changed quite a bit over last week.


NS are hardly worth train wreck status. They lost some strong players and they have done well with what they have.
[/quote]

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?
[/quote]

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.
[/quote]

Then MNS should be fine. But if he's coached a few seasons and never made a playoff or better yet was in the bottom 5, then player turnover will be huge and expect to be the next Panthers next season
[/quote]

Might want to do a little research.
[/quote]

An educated post on MHT? You are a funny guy.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:07 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 1:13 pm Interesting when comparing the provincial rank of teams this year vs last year. What's everyone thoughts on whether is coaching or players which caused the the better/worse?

Improved Teams:

Beast - ranked 8 vs 74 last year
Jets - ranked 37 vs 53 last year
Terriers - ranked 24 vs 30 last year
Sharks - ranked 70 vs 75 last year
Eagles - ranked 3 vs 6 last year
West Mall - ranked 76 vs 79 last year

No change:

Rangers - ranked 1 vs 1 last year
Wolverines - ranked 57 vs 57 last year
Rattlers - ranked 18 vs 17 last year

Train wrecks:

Streetsville - ranked 87 vs 78 last year
Northstars - ranked 26 vs 15 last year
Caps - ranked 59 vs 40 last year
Toros - ranked 63 vs 35 last year
Panthers - ranked 91 vs 21 last year

Maybe view at years end to get a better idea after the full body of work is over. Even today the rankings have changed quite a bit over last week.


NS are hardly worth train wreck status. They lost some strong players and they have done well with what they have.

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:59 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:07 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 1:13 pm Interesting when comparing the provincial rank of teams this year vs last year. What's everyone thoughts on whether is coaching or players which caused the the better/worse?

Improved Teams:

Beast - ranked 8 vs 74 last year
Jets - ranked 37 vs 53 last year
Terriers - ranked 24 vs 30 last year
Sharks - ranked 70 vs 75 last year
Eagles - ranked 3 vs 6 last year
West Mall - ranked 76 vs 79 last year

No change:

Rangers - ranked 1 vs 1 last year
Wolverines - ranked 57 vs 57 last year
Rattlers - ranked 18 vs 17 last year

Train wrecks:

Streetsville - ranked 87 vs 78 last year
Northstars - ranked 26 vs 15 last year
Caps - ranked 59 vs 40 last year
Toros - ranked 63 vs 35 last year
Panthers - ranked 91 vs 21 last year

Maybe view at years end to get a better idea after the full body of work is over. Even today the rankings have changed quite a bit over last week.


NS are hardly worth train wreck status. They lost some strong players and they have done well with what they have.

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

They won't be as strong as your glass breathing ass. Move on. You are the greatest. All coaches suck compared to you. "Strong" coaches - I mean that's impossible. You, sir, are an idiot.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:52 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:59 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:07 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 1:13 pm Interesting when comparing the provincial rank of teams this year vs last year. What's everyone thoughts on whether is coaching or players which caused the the better/worse?

Improved Teams:

Beast - ranked 8 vs 74 last year
Jets - ranked 37 vs 53 last year
Terriers - ranked 24 vs 30 last year
Sharks - ranked 70 vs 75 last year
Eagles - ranked 3 vs 6 last year
West Mall - ranked 76 vs 79 last year

No change:

Rangers - ranked 1 vs 1 last year
Wolverines - ranked 57 vs 57 last year
Rattlers - ranked 18 vs 17 last year

Train wrecks:

Streetsville - ranked 87 vs 78 last year
Northstars - ranked 26 vs 15 last year
Caps - ranked 59 vs 40 last year
Toros - ranked 63 vs 35 last year
Panthers - ranked 91 vs 21 last year

Maybe view at years end to get a better idea after the full body of work is over. Even today the rankings have changed quite a bit over last week.


NS are hardly worth train wreck status. They lost some strong players and they have done well with what they have.

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

They won't be as strong as your glass breathing ass. Move on. You are the greatest. All coaches suck compared to you. "Strong" coaches - I mean that's impossible. You, sir, are an idiot.

Ok cool. But seriously, who are they?

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 8:28 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:52 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:59 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:13 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:07 pm

Maybe view at years end to get a better idea after the full body of work is over. Even today the rankings have changed quite a bit over last week.


NS are hardly worth train wreck status. They lost some strong players and they have done well with what they have.

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

They won't be as strong as your glass breathing ass. Move on. You are the greatest. All coaches suck compared to you. "Strong" coaches - I mean that's impossible. You, sir, are an idiot.

Ok cool. But seriously, who are they?

They don't want you.

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:24 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 8:28 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:52 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:59 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:13 pm

Fair.....Wolverines had some good movement this week and in the improved category. Should definitely look at this before playoffs. Good indication of teams track record and a report card on the coaches before considering teams for next year.
NS have done well with what they were able to replace with existing coach for now. I can't see them get any better next year, big shoes to fill on the coaching front. Does the new guy have the track record?

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

They won't be as strong as your glass breathing ass. Move on. You are the greatest. All coaches suck compared to you. "Strong" coaches - I mean that's impossible. You, sir, are an idiot.

Ok cool. But seriously, who are they?

They don't want you.

Who are the bad ones? Maybe that’s an easier question

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:50 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:24 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 8:28 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:52 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:59 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:21 pm

He does, who knows what player turnover will be but coaching they'll be fine. Heard a couple of strong coaches coming into the division next year. MNS and Toros.

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

They won't be as strong as your glass breathing ass. Move on. You are the greatest. All coaches suck compared to you. "Strong" coaches - I mean that's impossible. You, sir, are an idiot.

Ok cool. But seriously, who are they?

They don't want you.

Who are the bad ones? Maybe that’s an easier question

You need to pick your poison with that one. I would do you homework if your shopping around. If they are not in the top 5 there is no reason you need to put up with any BS. There is enough opinions and facts on this board to help make that decision.

Guest wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:21 am

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:50 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:24 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 8:28 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 7:52 pm

Guest wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 6:59 pm

Who are these "strong" coaches you speak of?

They won't be as strong as your glass breathing ass. Move on. You are the greatest. All coaches suck compared to you. "Strong" coaches - I mean that's impossible. You, sir, are an idiot.

Ok cool. But seriously, who are they?

They don't want you.

Who are the bad ones? Maybe that’s an easier question

You need to pick your poison with that one. I would do you homework if your shopping around. If they are not in the top 5 there is no reason you need to put up with any BS. There is enough opinions and facts on this board to help make that decision.

google searches reveal wonders. wait until the 15