Yes, driving force dad was given a $$$ deal.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 7:36 amSomeone players are in for a complete surprise when they realize what this was all about. $$$$$Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 2:11 pmSounds like they will be just as bad as this year.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:15 amTRW are getting half the Ajax/pickering team, and 4 forwards from Northshore.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:09 amAre they the top kids from YSE and the other centre going to TRW? Or are they the second tier kids whose parents think they should have had more ice..Guest wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:19 pm Movement day is tomorrow
Who goes where?
Who is losing their top players?
Who is chasing brick and going to Marlies?
JRC losing their top player
WW losing a couple ? Where are they going.
TRW is all OMHA
MHR = TMZ
This is the first crack in the friendship group. its all about to implode soon
2015 AAA
Re: 2015 AAA
Re: 2015 AAA
HA HA HA! The lengths people will go to anonymously on here or running around rinks telling lies to trash their “friends”.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 8:21 amYes, driving force dad was given a $$$ deal.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 7:36 amSomeone players are in for a complete surprise when they realize what this was all about. $$$$$Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 2:11 pmSounds like they will be just as bad as this year.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 10:15 amTRW are getting half the Ajax/pickering team, and 4 forwards from Northshore.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 8:09 amAre they the top kids from YSE and the other centre going to TRW? Or are they the second tier kids whose parents think they should have had more ice..Guest wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:19 pm Movement day is tomorrow
Who goes where?
Who is losing their top players?
Who is chasing brick and going to Marlies?
JRC losing their top player
WW losing a couple ? Where are they going.
TRW is all OMHA
MHR = TMZ
This is the first crack in the friendship group. its all about to implode soon
Re: 2015 AAA
Most teams at this age should be running with 5D and some will even run with 8F. Easier to everyone involved in the game while giving some extra ice to whoever’s going that game.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 11:32 pmIt’s always better to ride a short bench of horses than to pick up a few donkeys just to fill a team.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 11:00 pmAny team with spots left obviously has been through this before. There’s always movement after the brick. This is where egos clash and parents get butt hurt.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 10:43 pmWhat tryouts? Any team with spots this late in the game is at the bottom.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:31 pm Rankings after tryouts:
1. TM
2. JRC
3. DMF
4. REPS
5. NATS
6. NYR
7. TT
8. REB
9. VK
10. SENS
11. MM
12. TRW
1. DMF
2. JRC
3. TM
4. NAT
5. REP
6. VK
7. REB
8. TT
9. MM
10. SEN
11. RW
12. NYR
Re: 2015 AAA
I have a AAA kid but he's not good enough to play for either Brick team. We were at westwood over the weekend and got to watch the PHD team practice a bit. If they can play as a team they will be scary good.
Re: 2015 AAA
We watched Saturday. Best fwd was HB best D was EM. Didn't even see LAGuest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 9:21 am I have a AAA kid but he's not good enough to play for either Brick team. We were at westwood over the weekend and got to watch the PHD team practice a bit. If they can play as a team they will be scary good.
Re: 2015 AAA
I doubt the go very far this year at brick. They have 3 forwards who shouldn't be there but are due to favours and will see limited ice, when they do see ice they will be awful. Their D is horrendous outside of 2 kids, the Ottawa kid and EMC kid are AA players.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 9:21 am I have a AAA kid but he's not good enough to play for either Brick team. We were at westwood over the weekend and got to watch the PHD team practice a bit. If they can play as a team they will be scary good.
PHD had this issue last year and we all know how that ended up, early exit from the TBD team who had the better D
Re: 2015 AAA
No drama, no bias — just a real take from someone coaching in the loop. I don’t have a kid in the mix, and I’m not here to push anyone’s narrative. This is how I see the teams stacking up heading into the season:
1. TM – The Brick pulls in U11. No surprise here — high-end skill across the board.
2. JRC – Long-term vision. Some kids left unhappy with structure, but the group that stayed will be stronger for it.
3. DMF – Picked up legit talent. Big question mark is whether RE can manage the egos, especially around the first line.
4. REB – Sleeper pick. Strong additions and very disciplined coaching staff.
5. NATS – Built for when contact hits, but we’re not there yet. HC is more focused on off-ice chatter with “prospects” than on development.
6. NYR – AK has deep OMHA ties through Bulldogs and his camps and a solid reputation. Attracted the most OMHA replacements only next to TRW. TBD.
7. TT – Total wildcard. Could finish much higher… or lower. Belissimo is unproven at this age group, and the imports from JRC, NYR, etc., aren’t game-changers. TBD.
8. VK – Strong overall program, but parent interference and immature coaching are holding them back.
9. REPS – One of the best team cultures around. MC brings a pro vibe, but with only 3 roster changes, they are likely to fall by overlooking the OMHA and other kids that are developing faster than their roster.
10. SENS – Quality coaches, but recruiting continues to be their Achilles' heel.
11. TRW – Ambitious attempt to become an OMHA force, but execution has been poor.
12. MM – Tough road ahead. Parent group lacks cohesion, and AE burned a lot of bridges with how he handled spring skates.
1. TM – The Brick pulls in U11. No surprise here — high-end skill across the board.
2. JRC – Long-term vision. Some kids left unhappy with structure, but the group that stayed will be stronger for it.
3. DMF – Picked up legit talent. Big question mark is whether RE can manage the egos, especially around the first line.
4. REB – Sleeper pick. Strong additions and very disciplined coaching staff.
5. NATS – Built for when contact hits, but we’re not there yet. HC is more focused on off-ice chatter with “prospects” than on development.
6. NYR – AK has deep OMHA ties through Bulldogs and his camps and a solid reputation. Attracted the most OMHA replacements only next to TRW. TBD.
7. TT – Total wildcard. Could finish much higher… or lower. Belissimo is unproven at this age group, and the imports from JRC, NYR, etc., aren’t game-changers. TBD.
8. VK – Strong overall program, but parent interference and immature coaching are holding them back.
9. REPS – One of the best team cultures around. MC brings a pro vibe, but with only 3 roster changes, they are likely to fall by overlooking the OMHA and other kids that are developing faster than their roster.
10. SENS – Quality coaches, but recruiting continues to be their Achilles' heel.
11. TRW – Ambitious attempt to become an OMHA force, but execution has been poor.
12. MM – Tough road ahead. Parent group lacks cohesion, and AE burned a lot of bridges with how he handled spring skates.
Re: 2015 AAA
We would all love to know who you coach with , but again you will never say, im going to go with TM lol. Buckle up buddy your in for a long season. As a parent on one of these teams im going to save this and repost it at the mid point and year end to see how well you know the age group.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:51 pm No drama, no bias — just a real take from someone coaching in the loop. I don’t have a kid in the mix, and I’m not here to push anyone’s narrative. This is how I see the teams stacking up heading into the season:
1. TM – The Brick pulls in U11. No surprise here — high-end skill across the board.
2. JRC – Long-term vision. Some kids left unhappy with structure, but the group that stayed will be stronger for it.
3. DMF – Picked up legit talent. Big question mark is whether RE can manage the egos, especially around the first line.
4. REB – Sleeper pick. Strong additions and very disciplined coaching staff.
5. NATS – Built for when contact hits, but we’re not there yet. HC is more focused on off-ice chatter with “prospects” than on development.
6. NYR – AK has deep OMHA ties through Bulldogs and his camps and a solid reputation. Attracted the most OMHA replacements only next to TRW. TBD.
7. TT – Total wildcard. Could finish much higher… or lower. Belissimo is unproven at this age group, and the imports from JRC, NYR, etc., aren’t game-changers. TBD.
8. VK – Strong overall program, but parent interference and immature coaching are holding them back.
9. REPS – One of the best team cultures around. MC brings a pro vibe, but with only 3 roster changes, they are likely to fall by overlooking the OMHA and other kids that are developing faster than their roster.
10. SENS – Quality coaches, but recruiting continues to be their Achilles' heel.
11. TRW – Ambitious attempt to become an OMHA force, but execution has been poor.
12. MM – Tough road ahead. Parent group lacks cohesion, and AE burned a lot of bridges with how he handled spring skates.
I bet you are very far off on all of this and will be coaching house league
Re: 2015 AAA
Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:57 pmWe would all love to know who you coach with , but again you will never say, im going to go with TM lol. Buckle up buddy your in for a long season. As a parent on one of these teams im going to save this and repost it at the mid point and year end to see how well you know the age group.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:51 pm No drama, no bias — just a real take from someone coaching in the loop. I don’t have a kid in the mix, and I’m not here to push anyone’s narrative. This is how I see the teams stacking up heading into the season:
1. TM – The Brick pulls in U11. No surprise here — high-end skill across the board.
2. JRC – Long-term vision. Some kids left unhappy with structure, but the group that stayed will be stronger for it.
3. DMF – Picked up legit talent. Big question mark is whether RE can manage the egos, especially around the first line.
4. REB – Sleeper pick. Strong additions and very disciplined coaching staff.
5. NATS – Built for when contact hits, but we’re not there yet. HC is more focused on off-ice chatter with “prospects” than on development.
6. NYR – AK has deep OMHA ties through Bulldogs and his camps and a solid reputation. Attracted the most OMHA replacements only next to TRW. TBD.
7. TT – Total wildcard. Could finish much higher… or lower. Belissimo is unproven at this age group, and the imports from JRC, NYR, etc., aren’t game-changers. TBD.
8. VK – Strong overall program, but parent interference and immature coaching are holding them back.
9. REPS – One of the best team cultures around. MC brings a pro vibe, but with only 3 roster changes, they are likely to fall by overlooking the OMHA and other kids that are developing faster than their roster.
10. SENS – Quality coaches, but recruiting continues to be their Achilles' heel.
11. TRW – Ambitious attempt to become an OMHA force, but execution has been poor.
12. MM – Tough road ahead. Parent group lacks cohesion, and AE burned a lot of bridges with how he handled spring skates.
I bet you are very far off on all of this and will be coaching house league
High end skills across the board….
Re: 2015 AAA
What's the over/under on Brett Kitchen punching one of the marlie moms in the face before December?Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 2:20 pmGuest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:57 pmWe would all love to know who you coach with , but again you will never say, im going to go with TM lol. Buckle up buddy your in for a long season. As a parent on one of these teams im going to save this and repost it at the mid point and year end to see how well you know the age group.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Apr 21, 2025 1:51 pm No drama, no bias — just a real take from someone coaching in the loop. I don’t have a kid in the mix, and I’m not here to push anyone’s narrative. This is how I see the teams stacking up heading into the season:
1. TM – The Brick pulls in U11. No surprise here — high-end skill across the board.
2. JRC – Long-term vision. Some kids left unhappy with structure, but the group that stayed will be stronger for it.
3. DMF – Picked up legit talent. Big question mark is whether RE can manage the egos, especially around the first line.
4. REB – Sleeper pick. Strong additions and very disciplined coaching staff.
5. NATS – Built for when contact hits, but we’re not there yet. HC is more focused on off-ice chatter with “prospects” than on development.
6. NYR – AK has deep OMHA ties through Bulldogs and his camps and a solid reputation. Attracted the most OMHA replacements only next to TRW. TBD.
7. TT – Total wildcard. Could finish much higher… or lower. Belissimo is unproven at this age group, and the imports from JRC, NYR, etc., aren’t game-changers. TBD.
8. VK – Strong overall program, but parent interference and immature coaching are holding them back.
9. REPS – One of the best team cultures around. MC brings a pro vibe, but with only 3 roster changes, they are likely to fall by overlooking the OMHA and other kids that are developing faster than their roster.
10. SENS – Quality coaches, but recruiting continues to be their Achilles' heel.
11. TRW – Ambitious attempt to become an OMHA force, but execution has been poor.
12. MM – Tough road ahead. Parent group lacks cohesion, and AE burned a lot of bridges with how he handled spring skates.
I bet you are very far off on all of this and will be coaching house league
High end skills across the board….. Go watch the “skills” on live barn 10am cwench center rink 3 you can see the parents pacing upstairs the best part is this is supposed to be a brick team
![]()
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post