sure ur better u use ineligible players from klvr. good for u .Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 1:43 pmThis is all fair but the top MNS kids are much better than anyone on VR. No C as good as 10 or 19. No D as good as 4 or 9 or 15.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 amSecond this.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 9:15 amActually VP is civilized. They're well respected.
VR is full of the wild ones- watched too much jersey shore growing up.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
2015 AA
Re: 2015 AA
Re: 2015 AA
VR is a good little team that has improved a lot. Respect for that.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 amSecond this.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
They lack a true star either up front or on defence. All around they are strong but that’s why they play close to equal ice! There is nobody who really should play more because they aren’t high-end.
Re: 2015 AA
You know they got kicked off before season started. Don’t be an idiot, or tell us who is still on the team that’s in Klevr. Nobody and you know it.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 1:51 pmsure ur better u use ineligible players from klvr. good for u .Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 1:43 pmThis is all fair but the top MNS kids are much better than anyone on VR. No C as good as 10 or 19. No D as good as 4 or 9 or 15.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 amSecond this.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
There are at least 2 other teams in the playoffs in west with Klevr players go there and fight your battle idiot.
Re: 2015 AA
VR definately plays equal ice. Watch any game and you will see their weakest kids on both PP and PK as well. They may not have a 'true star' as you put it, but they do have kids who skill level is far below the average on the team on both F and D. Theyd win more if those kids sat more...Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:13 pmVR is a good little team that has improved a lot. Respect for that.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 amSecond this.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 9:15 amActually VP is civilized. They're well respected.
VR is full of the wild ones- watched too much jersey shore growing up.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
They lack a true star either up front or on defence. All around they are strong but that’s why they play close to equal ice! There is nobody who really should play more because they aren’t high-end.
I respect that they dont emphasize winning at the cost of development.
Re: 2015 AA
??i betGuest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:16 pm Heard the wh skate on the weekend was 10/10
Re: 2015 AA
This argument again that makes no sense every time but people keep saying it.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:21 pmVR definately plays equal ice. Watch any game and you will see their weakest kids on both PP and PK as well. They may not have a 'true star' as you put it, but they do have kids who skill level is far below the average on the team on both F and D. Theyd win more if those kids sat more...Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:13 pmVR is a good little team that has improved a lot. Respect for that.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 amSecond this.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
They lack a true star either up front or on defence. All around they are strong but that’s why they play close to equal ice! There is nobody who really should play more because they aren’t high-end.
I respect that they dont emphasize winning at the cost of development.
If you are “far below average” on a team that isn’t even a top 3 team you should probably be in A. It’s not just VR, MNS has 3-4 of these at least.
Coaches responsibility to cut them but parents responsibility to take them to play where they could realistically develop !
Re: 2015 AA
I fully agree, but we're at the end of the year. Some kids have not developed as well as others, which has left them behind. Coaches choose these kids to be part of team likely thinking they would improve more then they did. So until year is over they still deserve to play rather fairly, until the last 5 minutes or so. Then when season is over, yes get cut.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:28 pmThis argument again that makes no sense every time but people keep saying it.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:21 pmVR definately plays equal ice. Watch any game and you will see their weakest kids on both PP and PK as well. They may not have a 'true star' as you put it, but they do have kids who skill level is far below the average on the team on both F and D. Theyd win more if those kids sat more...Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:13 pmVR is a good little team that has improved a lot. Respect for that.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 amSecond this.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 9:15 am
Actually VP is civilized. They're well respected.
VR is full of the wild ones- watched too much jersey shore growing up.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
They lack a true star either up front or on defence. All around they are strong but that’s why they play close to equal ice! There is nobody who really should play more because they aren’t high-end.
I respect that they dont emphasize winning at the cost of development.
If you are “far below average” on a team that isn’t even a top 3 team you should probably be in A. It’s not just VR, MNS has 3-4 of these at least.
Coaches responsibility to cut them but parents responsibility to take them to play where they could realistically develop !
Re: 2015 AA
Lots of kids showed up?Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:16 pm Heard the wh skate on the weekend was 10/10
Re: 2015 AA
On our team all 3 of the kids on the bubble had their parents begging coach to stay next year, had friends on team and would be too hard to accept going down a level. Yes coaches have to get strong but let’s not pretend like these parents are all realisticGuest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:49 pmI fully agree, but we're at the end of the year. Some kids have not developed as well as others, which has left them behind. Coaches choose these kids to be part of team likely thinking they would improve more then they did. So until year is over they still deserve to play rather fairly, until the last 5 minutes or so. Then when season is over, yes get cut.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:28 pmThis argument again that makes no sense every time but people keep saying it.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:21 pmVR definately plays equal ice. Watch any game and you will see their weakest kids on both PP and PK as well. They may not have a 'true star' as you put it, but they do have kids who skill level is far below the average on the team on both F and D. Theyd win more if those kids sat more...Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 2:13 pmVR is a good little team that has improved a lot. Respect for that.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 12:08 pmWhat's wrong with VR coaches or parents? Their parents differ from others only by being slightly louder. But what else would you expect from a group that is 95% Italian? That said, unlike some other teams I won’t name, I haven’t seen drunk fathers or loud, offensive mothers yelling at referees or opposing teams.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:30 am
Second this.
Never a problem with the VP parents, before during or after the game.
VR different story and goes to the coaching too.
Comparing VR to MNS (whose parents are also very nice), VR's players are stronger on average, while the top kids on both teams are of similar skill. MNS has the better goalie. Key difference is that VR gives all players ice time. I’ve never noticed them prioritizing anyone, whereas MNS plays to win, meaning some kids get significantly more ice time than others. This approach is good for the league in general, as it raises the level of competition, helps secure victories for MNS when top players are not absent, but isn’t great for overall development or team depth.
Despite being a skilled team, VR seems to lack a winning mentality or self-confidence. If the coaches address this issue or if it naturally corrects itself the team will rise higher in the standings.
They lack a true star either up front or on defence. All around they are strong but that’s why they play close to equal ice! There is nobody who really should play more because they aren’t high-end.
I respect that they dont emphasize winning at the cost of development.
If you are “far below average” on a team that isn’t even a top 3 team you should probably be in A. It’s not just VR, MNS has 3-4 of these at least.
Coaches responsibility to cut them but parents responsibility to take them to play where they could realistically develop !