2010 GTHL A East
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Noschitt Sherlock, nobody suggested otherwise.Guest wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2024 8:45 amNobody moves on from Silverstick at the A once U14 kicks in....its just a weekend tournament...read the fine printGuest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:35 pmRidiculous comment.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:41 pmI'm curious why any U14A and up teams would even play in the SIlverstick anymore? You can't move on because of no body checking. It's only a 3 game guarantee. Field looks pretty weak as well. So many better tourneys to play in.
U16A has 12 teams playing this year and U17A has 16 teams.
What other tournaments can you move on from in non contact hockey? None? Ok, thanks for the input Leroy.
Aside from VRW, field was solid.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
What teams need to be in the tournament to meet your standard?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 8:17 pmA Challenge Cup and Oakville Winter classic had and have better teams.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:35 pmRidiculous comment.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:41 pmI'm curious why any U14A and up teams would even play in the SIlverstick anymore? You can't move on because of no body checking. It's only a 3 game guarantee. Field looks pretty weak as well. So many better tourneys to play in.
U16A has 12 teams playing this year and U17A has 16 teams.
What other tournaments can you move on from in non contact hockey? None? Ok, thanks for the input Leroy.
Aside from VRW, field was solid.
TE, SIR and ?
It's non contact A. Limited options and a crapshoot wherever and whenever you register.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
That standard is the standard right now for A, so yes. Oakville has a good field of teams. Siliverstick had none of the big boys...but regardless, good on Port Credit for the W in a just below top tier groupingGuest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 12:16 amWhat teams need to be in the tournament to meet your standard?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 8:17 pmA Challenge Cup and Oakville Winter classic had and have better teams.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:35 pmRidiculous comment.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:41 pmI'm curious why any U14A and up teams would even play in the SIlverstick anymore? You can't move on because of no body checking. It's only a 3 game guarantee. Field looks pretty weak as well. So many better tourneys to play in.
U16A has 12 teams playing this year and U17A has 16 teams.
What other tournaments can you move on from in non contact hockey? None? Ok, thanks for the input Leroy.
Aside from VRW, field was solid.
TE, SIR and ?
It's non contact A. Limited options and a crapshoot wherever and whenever you register.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Who are these big boys you speak of?Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 8:19 amThat standard is the standard right now for A, so yes. Oakville has a good field of teams. Siliverstick had none of the big boys...but regardless, good on Port Credit for the W in a just below top tier groupingGuest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 12:16 amWhat teams need to be in the tournament to meet your standard?Guest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 8:17 pmA Challenge Cup and Oakville Winter classic had and have better teams.Guest wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:35 pmRidiculous comment.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 12:41 pmI'm curious why any U14A and up teams would even play in the SIlverstick anymore? You can't move on because of no body checking. It's only a 3 game guarantee. Field looks pretty weak as well. So many better tourneys to play in.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Dec 11, 2024 11:54 am
I’d bet on Applewood and NT finishing ahead of TR in pool B.
U16A has 12 teams playing this year and U17A has 16 teams.
What other tournaments can you move on from in non contact hockey? None? Ok, thanks for the input Leroy.
Aside from VRW, field was solid.
TE, SIR and ?
It's non contact A. Limited options and a crapshoot wherever and whenever you register.
NT and VRE are 3rd and 4th by points, and 3rd by win % (a hair behind FH with games in hand.)
PC and AW are 1st and 3rd in the MHL by points and win %.
You’ve got 4 top 3 teams in an 8 team field. Maybe not the toughest group ever assembled. But “none of the big boys” is the kind of thing you say when you know squat about the game.
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Skill (Not placement)
1. FH
2. SIR
3. TA
4. TRT
5. VRE(Tied with TRT)
6. NT
7. LF
8. YM
9. WHGH
10. NYK
11. MI
12. WBH
13. GPR
gathered many proofs for the accuracy of this ranking so come at me if u want
1. FH
2. SIR
3. TA
4. TRT
5. VRE(Tied with TRT)
6. NT
7. LF
8. YM
9. WHGH
10. NYK
11. MI
12. WBH
13. GPR
gathered many proofs for the accuracy of this ranking so come at me if u want
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
Your algorithm is flawed.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 6:39 pm Skill (Not placement)
1. FH
2. SIR
3. TA
4. TRT
5. VRE(Tied with TRT)
6. NT
7. LF
8. YM
9. WHGH
10. NYK
11. MI
12. WBH
13. GPR
gathered many proofs for the accuracy of this ranking so come at me if u want
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
I thought that must be a typo but then checked all of Leaside’s scores and they have now beaten SIR, FH and VRE and tied NT and TA. But also lost to NYK and WHGH. Weird.Guest wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:03 pmLF3 SIR2
Re: 2010 GTHL A East
LF goalie is excellent and can steal any close game.