And you know that how? The reality is that 99.9% of all players, including on the best teams will not make it to the big show. However, this does not mean that a kid that is currently playing at a lower level or on a not so good team won’t Develop and surpass some of the current AAA players you are delusional. This is the age when kids start growing and developing both physically and psychologically.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 3:07 pmWrong. My kid plays AA. But, are the top AA kids just as talented as most of the players on bad AAA teams?!? Probably. Not sure what the point is. The truth is they are all really good AA players, or, low end AAA......and none of them are going to the show, or, getting scholarships.....so just have fun because next stop is beer league.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 11:46 amlol. This is just a REP dad looking to feed his ego. You’re out to lunch.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 8:19 amThere is evidence what the results would be. My Hockey Rankings is extremely accurate. It's not subjective. It's pure math. If you check the rankings you would see that, on average, the reps and mm would beat top AA by 2 goals on average. The AA teams could definately beat the reps and mm, but, if they played a bunch of games the average scores would be reps and mm win by 2 goals.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 8:13 amThe top AA teams wouod not beat reps or mm, however would compete and top AA players could play there but not beat them. Big gap and stop using them as my kid could play AAA but i chose to play AA.
2012 GTHL AA West
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Not in this loop. Top two coaches will end 1-2 this year. The others have not shown that they’re capable of developing players or winning teams. That’s just facts. If you want the best coach, You want the best development, look at your 1/2 teams this year.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:01 amClearly there has to be more than twoGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:24 pmThere are two coaches in this loop that truly develop players and he’s one of them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:17 pmyes sorry I missed that. so MB vs. MT, GTC vs. FT. i'm amazed at how good the coaching at MB is to finish 1st with the talent they have/don't have...good for them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:14 pmWell the beasts play terriers. That’s consequential for them to hold onto first.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:11 pm handful of games left. only game of consequence is GTC vs FT for FT to finish in top 3.
lots of close scores lately hopefully setting up for a competition playoff 1st round.
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
If the budgets were the same then you are correct. If the budgets were higher on the "1/2" teams than the others, then it's still correct but with an asterix. That's also facts.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:32 amNot in this loop. Top two coaches will end 1-2 this year. The others have not shown that they’re capable of developing players or winning teams. That’s just facts. If you want the best coach, You want the best development, look at your 1/2 teams this year.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:01 amClearly there has to be more than twoGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:24 pmThere are two coaches in this loop that truly develop players and he’s one of them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:17 pmyes sorry I missed that. so MB vs. MT, GTC vs. FT. i'm amazed at how good the coaching at MB is to finish 1st with the talent they have/don't have...good for them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:14 pmWell the beasts play terriers. That’s consequential for them to hold onto first.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:11 pm handful of games left. only game of consequence is GTC vs FT for FT to finish in top 3.
lots of close scores lately hopefully setting up for a competition playoff 1st round.
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
If your point is that you get what you pay for then yes, those teams budgets are higher because they have paid coaches with proven experience.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 12:04 amIf the budgets were the same then you are correct. If the budgets were higher on the "1/2" teams than the others, then it's still correct but with an asterix. That's also facts.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:32 amNot in this loop. Top two coaches will end 1-2 this year. The others have not shown that they’re capable of developing players or winning teams. That’s just facts. If you want the best coach, You want the best development, look at your 1/2 teams this year.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:01 amClearly there has to be more than twoGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:24 pmThere are two coaches in this loop that truly develop players and he’s one of them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:17 pmyes sorry I missed that. so MB vs. MT, GTC vs. FT. i'm amazed at how good the coaching at MB is to finish 1st with the talent they have/don't have...good for them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:14 pm
Well the beasts play terriers. That’s consequential for them to hold onto first.
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Aren’t they all paid coaches?Guest wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 12:37 pmIf your point is that you get what you pay for then yes, those teams budgets are higher because they have paid coaches with proven experience.Guest wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 12:04 amIf the budgets were the same then you are correct. If the budgets were higher on the "1/2" teams than the others, then it's still correct but with an asterix. That's also facts.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:32 amNot in this loop. Top two coaches will end 1-2 this year. The others have not shown that they’re capable of developing players or winning teams. That’s just facts. If you want the best coach, You want the best development, look at your 1/2 teams this year.Guest wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 9:01 amClearly there has to be more than twoGuest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:24 pmThere are two coaches in this loop that truly develop players and he’s one of them.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:17 pm
yes sorry I missed that. so MB vs. MT, GTC vs. FT. i'm amazed at how good the coaching at MB is to finish 1st with the talent they have/don't have...good for them.
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Who's going to take it? I like the Beast! Too much depth! Coach rolls all the lines....
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Well we know what team your kid is onGuest wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 10:26 pm Who's going to take it? I like the Beast! Too much depth! Coach rolls all the lines....
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
MB fan boy!
If he rolls all the lines why is half the team cut then? where is the development? let's call it what it is. coach has great system and all players bought in. all just part of a machine. zero creativity allowed. guess what? it works. GT needs upgrades to maintain top 3 status next year.
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Gt has a lot of talent which is probably why they finished second. It’s a good team. Wondering how many cuts there will be. Maybe a handful that are averageGuest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 1:14 pmMB fan boy!
If he rolls all the lines why is half the team cut then? where is the development? let's call it what it is. coach has great system and all players bought in. all just part of a machine. zero creativity allowed. guess what? it works. GT needs upgrades to maintain top 3 status next year.
Re: 2012 GTHL AA West
Sorry he has his favorites that are on every other shift or double shifted. He’s not a saint. They all do itGuest wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 1:14 pmMB fan boy!
If he rolls all the lines why is half the team cut then? where is the development? let's call it what it is. coach has great system and all players bought in. all just part of a machine. zero creativity allowed. guess what? it works. GT needs upgrades to maintain top 3 status next year.